on being sick, and sick days
Nov. 18th, 2004 11:40 amSo, I am home from work today because of this ^$*&* cold. After 4 days of trying to "work through" it, I have decided that I need a day of rest if I'm going to shake it.
Now, Tufts gives me unlimited sick time -- and I do not abuse it. Had I been working in a place that is more stingy, this fall would have been troublesome, given how many colds I have had, and the 6 or so days taken for surgery, recovering from surgery, and the endoscopy.
But a lot of people wouldn't take today as a sick day, were they in my position. To a lot of people, "sick" means high fever, you can't get out of bed, and/or you are spending all your time in the bathroom barfing and or running at the other end. And a lot of low end jobs will just fire you if you are home sick for more than a day or two.
So what's better, taking a day to rest in hopes of shortening the total illness duration, or working because you are not "sick enough" to really need to stay home?
Because of the flu vaccine shortage, the state is urging employees to take sick time if they need to, and employers to be a bit more generous about letting ill people have time off. People who have the flu shouldn't be out in public; it spreads easily, including when one is symptomatic. It can kill people, especially those in risk groups, who can't be expected to lock themselves at home for the entire winter. But all this is mitigated by the American tendency to push for "greater productivity" and the lack of paid sick time in many workplaces and the fact that parents often take sick days to take care of their sick kids. I did get a flu shot (I am in two high risk groups, p;ossibly three), but I am waiting to see what happens if we have a bad flu season this year...
Now, Tufts gives me unlimited sick time -- and I do not abuse it. Had I been working in a place that is more stingy, this fall would have been troublesome, given how many colds I have had, and the 6 or so days taken for surgery, recovering from surgery, and the endoscopy.
But a lot of people wouldn't take today as a sick day, were they in my position. To a lot of people, "sick" means high fever, you can't get out of bed, and/or you are spending all your time in the bathroom barfing and or running at the other end. And a lot of low end jobs will just fire you if you are home sick for more than a day or two.
So what's better, taking a day to rest in hopes of shortening the total illness duration, or working because you are not "sick enough" to really need to stay home?
Because of the flu vaccine shortage, the state is urging employees to take sick time if they need to, and employers to be a bit more generous about letting ill people have time off. People who have the flu shouldn't be out in public; it spreads easily, including when one is symptomatic. It can kill people, especially those in risk groups, who can't be expected to lock themselves at home for the entire winter. But all this is mitigated by the American tendency to push for "greater productivity" and the lack of paid sick time in many workplaces and the fact that parents often take sick days to take care of their sick kids. I did get a flu shot (I am in two high risk groups, p;ossibly three), but I am waiting to see what happens if we have a bad flu season this year...
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 09:00 am (UTC)I still feel that internally, but some of the best feelings of relief I've had have been upon deciding that I was feeling rather ick (like you have been), and that I don't *need* to go to work. That realization is remarkably freeing.
Rest up, feel better, don't feel guilty.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 03:14 pm (UTC)(I don't seem to ever get a fever of any significance no matter how sick I am. In the last decade I can only recall having an elevated temperature *once*, and then it was barely over 99, and I was rather scarily sick. Of course my baseline temperature is a bit low to begin with...)
Of course I also *do* tend to go into work when I am really way, way too sick to be there... And I certainly remember more than one time arguing with my parents because they thought I was clearly too sick to go to school (I was) but I felt that I needed to be there. (Why yes, I *was* a ridiculously hyper-responsible kid...)
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 03:30 pm (UTC)I didn't have a fever, leading up to the diabetes diagnosis. People rarely do. What I did have was going from 72 lbs. to 52 lbs. in 6 weeks, and by the end, drinking several gallons of juice each day (and getting up all night to pee and drink more). When I finally did get to a doctor who had a clue -- who knew what was going on when I walked into the office because of how I smelled -- I got packed off to the hospital, stat! without even getting to go home for a toothbrush.
Of course, I'm assuming your mom would have flexed her rule for something like this, or other serious problems that don't involve a fever...
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 03:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 09:37 am (UTC)Another problem is that employers are so short-term minded. They don't think, "Hey, if I let this one sick person stay home for a few days, the rest of my staff might not become infected...." One suspects they aren't very bright....
Wondering about this year's flu season too.
Hope you feel better soon.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 09:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 10:37 am (UTC)For my part, I believe that if I'm sick enough so that it affects my work, it's best in the long run if I take the momentary productivity hit of a day's rest. If I drag myself into work anyway in such a state I'm likely to work at half-efficiency at best, and make serious mistakes in the other half that I'll only have to do over anyway. The resulting "invisible" productivity hit is likely to be much more than one day.
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 03:16 pm (UTC)I hope you feel better soon!
no subject
Date: 2004-11-18 04:52 pm (UTC)I don't know if he ever enforced his policy, but it got the point across that some things shouldn't be shared.